Posted by Brad @ 2:45 pm on January 4th 2009

Franken Wins

The official recount is over, but not necessarily the election.

DFLer Al Franken held an unofficial lead of 225 votes over Coleman, according to a newspaper tally of the officials’ count of the absentee ballots. Franken had led unofficially by 49 votes going into the day and gained a net 176 votes from the new ballots.

With the recount complete, focus immediately shifted to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which continued to consider a request from the Coleman campaign to alter the process and add more absentee ballots to be reconsidered. But by early evening there was no word from the state’s highest court as to when it would rule or hear arguments. [...]

Under state law, an election certificate formally naming a winner cannot be issued until all legal disputes are resolved.

The lawsuit, called an election contest, is expected to center on the issue of the excluded absentee ballots as well as disputes over ballots the Coleman campaign believes were double counted and a decision to use Election Day machine totals, rather than recount totals, in a Minneapolis precinct where more than 100 ballots went missing.

The problem for Coleman from here on out is two-fold.

Either way, a number of legal stratagems that might have seemed appealing to the Coleman campaign might now be somewhat mooted. For instance, even if all 130 ballots that the Coleman campaign claimed were double-counted for Franken were removed from his tally (but no ballots at all had been double-counted for Coleman), Franken would maintain a significant advantage. With Franken doing so well among the absentee ballots that were counted today, moreover, any Coleman attempts to get more absentee ballots counted would seem to have a high risk of backfiring.

Coleman has a number of recourses left him, but none of them look very promising. Moreover, the #1 rule that we’ve learned in the last 10 years about recounts—the psychological benefits of coming out of the recount ahead, by hook or crook, are enormous, often prohibitive. My guess is the people are Minnesota are ready to seat their second Senator.

1 Comment »

  1. I like Franken, although I don’t have any great hopes for him as a Senator. I also can’t really believe that he was really the best candidate the DFL could put up in Minnesota.

    Comment by Adam — 1/4/2009 @ 7:26 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.