Comments on: Sign O the Times http://thecrossedpond.com/2008/10/25/sign-o-the-times-2/ "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:40:44 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Adam http://thecrossedpond.com/2008/10/25/sign-o-the-times-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17936 Adam Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:59:27 +0000 http://thecrossedpond.com/?p=5870#comment-17936 Cameron #1: it would either be that or registration percentages in that state. In any case, they should re-weight according to a measure like that, so the raw percentages in the sample shouldn't matter that much. Cameron #1: it would either be that or registration percentages in that state. In any case, they should re-weight according to a measure like that, so the raw percentages in the sample shouldn’t matter that much.

]]> By: Brad http://thecrossedpond.com/2008/10/25/sign-o-the-times-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17931 Brad Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:48:47 +0000 http://thecrossedpond.com/?p=5870#comment-17931 <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/27/14221/410/20/643743" rel="nofollow">And it's not an outlier</a>. Ouch. And it’s not an outlier.

Ouch.

]]> By: Cameron http://thecrossedpond.com/2008/10/25/sign-o-the-times-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17899 Cameron Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:58:52 +0000 http://thecrossedpond.com/?p=5870#comment-17899 Am I correct in presuming that the reason the sample is skewed toward the Republican side aisle is because that's the historic voting percentages in the state? Regardless, who here can say bloodbath? Am I correct in presuming that the reason the sample is skewed toward the Republican side aisle is because that’s the historic voting percentages in the state?

Regardless, who here can say bloodbath?

]]>