Here comes Huckabee II: Huckaboogaloo
Eighteen percent in Iowa, says Rasmussen.
All he needs…all he’s ever needed…is for Republicans to take a long look.
Well, that and about $10 million.
Eighteen percent in Iowa, says Rasmussen.
All he needs…all he’s ever needed…is for Republicans to take a long look.
Well, that and about $10 million.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
That is rather startling. Is it an outlier?
As I have been saying for a while, I can constuct (what I think is) a very feasible scenario in which any of five or six candidates win the Republican nomination, and Huckabee is definetaly one of them. I started saying this not too long after I started reading this blog, what with Rojas’ “Dont sell Huckabee short” posts and Brad’s historical analysis of non-incumbant primaries. So, credit where credit is due I suppose.
Comment by Misanthrope — 10/17/2007 @ 9:51 pm
No, it’s not an outlier, I don’t think. He’s been in the double digits in Iowa for a month or two, creeping up.
One of us here bought a bunch of stock a month ago in Huckabee winning Iowa.
Comment by Brad — 10/17/2007 @ 9:59 pm
One of us here CAN’T buy any stock in Huckabee, because his Huckabee sales a month ago got retroactively invalidated as “suspicious trades”; and because he purchased about 5000 shares in Obama, anticipating the third quarter fundraising numbers, only to have the stock lose a quarter of its value within a week.
Comment by Rojas — 10/17/2007 @ 10:08 pm
And he’s raised all of 45,000 for October so far. He might be polling fairly high in Iowa(where i suppose ther is no shortage of people who believe the earth is 6000 years old and like ethanol subsidies), but he hasn’t moved at all on intrade.com.
Comment by Kaligula — 10/17/2007 @ 11:06 pm